Islamabad — June 2025: In a landmark judgment, the Islamabad High Court (IHC) has ordered the dissolution of the Capital Development Authority (CDA) and directed the federal government to transfer all municipal functions, assets, and responsibilities to the Islamabad Metropolitan Corporation (IMC). This historic verdict, issued by Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani, marks a pivotal turn in the capital’s governance structure and reinforces the constitutional mandate for local self-governance.
⸻
Table of Contents
🏛️ Background: CDA vs. MCI – A Long-standing Jurisdictional Conflict
Since its establishment in 1960 under the CDA Ordinance, the CDA has functioned as a centralized authority for the planning, development, and municipal administration of Islamabad. However, with the enactment of the Islamabad Capital Territory Local Government Act, 2015, the MCI was introduced as the elected local government body responsible for municipal services.
Despite this, a power struggle continued between the two entities for years, with the CDA maintaining de facto control over many critical functions such as sanitation, construction approvals, water supply, and urban development—often sidelining the elected MCI and undermining democratic decentralization.
⸻
⚖️ The Core Legal Dispute: CDA’s Controversial SRO
The IHC’s ruling emerged in response to a petition challenging SRO No. 576(I)/2015, issued by the CDA, which imposed hefty “Right of Way” and “Direct Access” charges on various private entities including petrol pumps, CNG stations, private housing societies, and commercial plazas along the Expressway.
Petitioners argued that:
•CDA had no statutory authority to levy such fees post-2015.
•The Local Government Act, 2015 had transferred these functions to the MCI.
•The SRO was issued without due legal process, violating constitutional principles of taxation under Article 77 and Article 140A of the Constitution of Pakistan.
⸻
📜 The IHC Verdict: Key Findings and Orders
Justice Mohsin Akhtar Kayani’s comprehensive verdict delivered the following directives:
1. The SRO is Null and Void
The court declared the SRO unconstitutional, emphasizing that only Parliament or a lawfully empowered local government can impose taxes or fees.
2. CDA’s Mandate Has Expired
Under Section 52 of the CDA Ordinance, the court held that the CDA’s municipal functions must cease. The local government (IMC) should now perform all related duties.
3. Complete Transfer of Powers and Assets
All administrative, financial, and infrastructural functions previously exercised by the CDA must be transferred to the Islamabad Metropolitan Corporation, as per the Local Government Act.
4. Refund of Unlawfully Collected Fees
The court ordered the federal government and CDA to refund all amounts collected under the invalid SRO—estimated in hundreds of millions of rupees.
⸻
🌐 Why This Judgment Matters: Legal, Administrative & Democratic Implications
✅ Strengthening Local Democracy
The ruling affirms the constitutional mandate for devolving power to elected local governments—a cornerstone of democratic governance. By sidelining the unelected CDA, the court has empowered elected representatives of Islamabad’s residents.
✅ Upholding the Rule of Law
The decision reinforces the legal principle that no authority can impose taxation without lawful empowerment. The CDA’s action was deemed an overreach and a violation of constitutional checks and balances.
✅ Promoting Accountability & Transparency
With IMC assuming charge, municipal decision-making will become more transparent, accountable, and participatory, provided the transition is implemented properly.
✅ Financial Impact
The judgment has major budgetary implications—not only will CDA’s collected fees need to be refunded, but IMC will now require significant institutional capacity-building and resource allocation to handle its new responsibilities.
⸻
⚙️ Challenges Ahead: A Fragile Transition
Despite the progressive outlook of this ruling, the path to implementation is not without hurdles:
•Bureaucratic Resistance: CDA officials may resist dissolution, citing operational challenges.
•Institutional Preparedness: IMC lacks the infrastructure and staff to immediately absorb all functions.
•Legal Gray Areas: Some development projects straddle federal and municipal domains.
•Political Interference: Shifts in government could impact the consistency of this decision’s enforcement.
To overcome these challenges, the federal government must act swiftly and transparently, formulating a transition strategy with clearly defined timelines, audit mechanisms, and legal oversight.
⸻
🧭 The Way Forward: Empowering Islamabad’s Citizens
The IHC’s judgment is not just a legal win; it is a call for governance reform. For Islamabad to truly flourish as a capital city:
•The citizenry must engage actively with local governance.
•The IMC must be equipped with skilled professionals, financial autonomy, and operational independence.
•The federal government must act as a facilitator, not a controller.
⸻
⚖️ Legal Insight by Legal Synergy
This case demonstrates how sound legal challenges can recalibrate governance in favor of constitutionalism, transparency, and public interest.
At Legal Synergy, we specialize in providing legal advisory, litigation, and strategic compliance services in matters of administrative law, local government affairs, constitutional petitions, and regulatory transitions.
If your organization, housing society, or business is impacted by this transition—or if you need guidance on local compliance, refund claims, or municipal affairs—our legal experts are equipped to assist with clarity and efficiency.
⸻
Legal Synergy — Where Law Meets Governance.